On May 3, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
On May 2, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
function, obd_cpt_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
function, obd_cpt_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
---
Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be
On May 2, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
function, obd_cpt_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr
---
Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
the call to
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 11:16:48PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be
inlined into the call sites?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h |
