>A patch intended to add a dependency on LNET for lustre didn't
>actually do that and instead allowed configurations that contain
>lustre with lnet but without IPv4 support that subsequently
>fail to link:
>
>warning: (LUSTRE_FS) selects LNET which has unmet direct dependencies (STAGING
>&& INET &
A patch intended to add a dependency on LNET for lustre didn't
actually do that and instead allowed configurations that contain
lustre with lnet but without IPv4 support that subsequently
fail to link:
warning: (LUSTRE_FS) selects LNET which has unmet direct dependencies (STAGING
&& INET && m &&