Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5028: use msecs_to_jiffies for timeouts

2015-01-22 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, wrote: the title should be 5208. sorry - that was a typo - should this be resubmitted for traceability or is that not necessary ? On 01/19/2015 03:25 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: This is only an API consolidation and should make things more readable

Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5028: use msecs_to_jiffies for timeouts

2015-01-22 Thread 敬锐
On 01/22/2015 05:01 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: sorry - that was a typo - should this be resubmitted for traceability or is that not necessary ? resubmit, thanks. ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org

Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5028: use msecs_to_jiffies for timeouts

2015-01-21 Thread 敬锐
the title should be 5208. On 01/19/2015 03:25 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: This is only an API consolidation and should make things more readable Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire der.h...@hofr.at --- Converting milliseconds to jiffies by val * HZ / 1000 is technically not wrong but

[PATCH] staging: rts5028: use msecs_to_jiffies for timeouts

2015-01-18 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
This is only an API consolidation and should make things more readable Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire der.h...@hofr.at --- Converting milliseconds to jiffies by val * HZ / 1000 is technically not wrong but msecs_to_jiffies(val) is the cleaner solution and handles corner cases correctly. This