> On 30 Sep 2017, at 07:27, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> The controversial part of this patch is that I've changed it so we now
> prevent integer overflows for VME_USER types and before we didn't. I
> view it as kernel-hardening. I looked at a couple places that used
> VME_USER types and they seem
The controversial part of this patch is that I've changed it so we now
prevent integer overflows for VME_USER types and before we didn't. I
view it as kernel-hardening. I looked at a couple places that used
VME_USER types and they seemed pretty suspicious so I'm pretty sure
preventing overflows h