On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 06:51:09PM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 02:01:49AM -0500, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
> >> From: Oleg Drokin
> >>
> >> These two patches tie some loose ends from the Lustre debugfs conve
On Feb 7, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 02:01:49AM -0500, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
>> From: Oleg Drokin
>>
>> These two patches tie some loose ends from the Lustre debugfs conversion,
>> but while investigating them I also accumulated some questions
>>
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 02:01:49AM -0500, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
> From: Oleg Drokin
>
> These two patches tie some loose ends from the Lustre debugfs conversion,
> but while investigating them I also accumulated some questions
> that would be good to get answers for.
>
> 1. Unlike procfs,
From: Oleg Drokin
These two patches tie some loose ends from the Lustre debugfs conversion,
but while investigating them I also accumulated some questions
that would be good to get answers for.
1. Unlike procfs, debugfs does not really guard your back and if root
comes in and tries to write to a
