Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RESEND][PATCH 0/5] Ion cleanup

2016-08-15 Thread Sumit Semwal
Hi Laura, On 14 August 2016 at 14:17, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > This series of patches look good for me, thanks for the clean up > > Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gaignard > > 2016-08-08 18:52 GMT+02:00 Laura Abbott : >> I never saw any feedback or action on these patches so this is a resend. >> Probab

Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/5] Ion cleanup

2016-08-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:52:53AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > I never saw any feedback or action on these patches so this is a resend. > Probably hit the window when everyone was busy/traveling. Yes, sorry about that, the old ones are still in my queue, but I'll take these now! greg k-h ___

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RESEND][PATCH 0/5] Ion cleanup

2016-08-14 Thread Benjamin Gaignard
This series of patches look good for me, thanks for the clean up Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gaignard 2016-08-08 18:52 GMT+02:00 Laura Abbott : > I never saw any feedback or action on these patches so this is a resend. > Probably hit the window when everyone was busy/traveling. > > --- > > Hi, > > Thi

[RESEND][PATCH 0/5] Ion cleanup

2016-08-08 Thread Laura Abbott
I never saw any feedback or action on these patches so this is a resend. Probably hit the window when everyone was busy/traveling. --- Hi, This is some clean up of old Ion interfaces and APIs. These are interfaces that mostly existed before dma_buf was well integrated into the kernel along with

[PATCH 0/5] Ion cleanup

2016-06-17 Thread Laura Abbott
Hi, This is some clean up of old Ion interfaces and APIs. These are interfaces that mostly existed before dma_buf was well integrated into the kernel along with reservations for board files. If there are objections to deletion I expect it to turn into a discussion about what other APIs need to b