On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:40 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:23 PM Sergio Paracuellos
> wrote:
> >
> > To avoid weird behaviour because of some drivers are
> > not using properly clocks we have the CLK_IGNORED_UNUSED, which as you
> > can see is currently being used in my
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:23 PM Sergio Paracuellos
wrote:
>
> To avoid weird behaviour because of some drivers are
> not using properly clocks we have the CLK_IGNORED_UNUSED, which as you
> can see is currently being used in my code. Using that all seems to
> work as expected as it is now.
The
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:34 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:26 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
> >
> > I've already said in previous threads that clock assignment in
> > current linux kernel is not trustworthy.
> > I've got the clock plan for mt7621 now. (Can't share it,
Hi Chuanhong,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:26 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
[snip]
>
> I've already said in previous threads that clock assignment in
> current linux kernel is not trustworthy.
> I've got the clock plan for mt7621 now. (Can't share it, sorry.)
> Most of your clock assumptions above are
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:26 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
>
> I've already said in previous threads that clock assignment in
> current linux kernel is not trustworthy.
> I've got the clock plan for mt7621 now. (Can't share it, sorry.)
> Most of your clock assumptions above are incorrect.
> I've made a
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:30 AM Sergio Paracuellos
wrote:
>
> This patchset ports CPU clock detection for MT7621 from OpenWrt
> and adds a complete clock plan for the mt7621 SOC.
>
> The documentation for this SOC only talks about two registers
> regarding to the clocks:
> *
This patchset ports CPU clock detection for MT7621 from OpenWrt
and adds a complete clock plan for the mt7621 SOC.
The documentation for this SOC only talks about two registers
regarding to the clocks:
* SYSC_REG_CPLL_CLKCFG0 - provides some information about boostrapped
refclock. PLL and
