On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> No, sys
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, syscall that existing 32-bit user space enters would be handled by
>
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> No, syscall that existing 32-bit user space enters would be handled by
>> compat_sys_nanosleep() on both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> >> >> Would this work for every
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> >> Would this work for everyone?
>> >
>> > Having extra config switches which are sele
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> >> Would this work for everyone?
> >
> > Having extra config switches which are selectable by architectures and
> > removed when everything is conve
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> > I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check
>> > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec
>> > bits.
>>
>> Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional o
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check
> > for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec
> > bits.
>
> Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional on
> CONFIG_64BIT_TIME and then removed as I forgot why I added i
> I had on concern about x32, maybe we should check
> for "COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME" before zeroing out the tv_nsec
> bits.
Thanks, I think you are right. I had the check conditional on
CONFIG_64BIT_TIME and then removed as I forgot why I added it. :)
> Regarding CONFIG_COMPAT_TIME/CONFIG_64BIT_TIME
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> The series is a preparation series for individual architectures
> to use 64 bit time_t syscalls in compat and 32 bit emulation modes.
>
> This is a follow up to the series Arnd Bergmann posted:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-05
The series is a preparation series for individual architectures
to use 64 bit time_t syscalls in compat and 32 bit emulation modes.
This is a follow up to the series Arnd Bergmann posted:
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-05/msg00070.html
Big picture is as per the lwn article:
https://lwn
11 matches
Mail list logo