On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 19:17 +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 18:32 +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> > > On Mar 12, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 13:00 -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> > > > > From:
On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 18:32 +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 13:00 -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> > > From: James Nunez
> > >
> > > This is one of the fixes broken out of patch 1 that was
> > >
On Mar 12, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 18:32 +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 13:00 -0500, James Simmons wrote:
From: James Nunez
This is one of the
On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 13:00 -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> From: James Nunez
>
> This is one of the fixes broken out of patch 1 that was
> missed in the merger. With this fix the CERROR called in
> sfw_handle_server_rpc will print out correctly.
Speaking of CERROR
On Mar 12, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 13:00 -0500, James Simmons wrote:
>> From: James Nunez
>>
>> This is one of the fixes broken out of patch 1 that was
>> missed in the merger. With this fix the CERROR called in
>>
From: James Nunez
This is one of the fixes broken out of patch 1 that was
missed in the merger. With this fix the CERROR called in
sfw_handle_server_rpc will print out correctly.
Signed-off-by: James Nunez
Intel-bug-id: