Rename the constant EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 to
EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1, this change clears the checkpatch
issue with CamelCase naming.
This is a coding style change which should have no impact on runtime
code execution.
Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitm...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 4 ++--
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
index 83a61fcab53b..7189249a898f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
@@ -2517,12 +2517,12 @@ static int rtl8192_read_eeprom_info(struct net_device
*dev)
*((u16 *)(&priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelCCK_V1[1])) =
tmpValue;
if (bLoad_From_EEPOM)
tmpValue = eprom_read(dev,
- EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 >> 1);
+ EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 >> 1);
else
tmpValue = 0x1010;
*((u16 *)(&priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[0])) =
tmpValue;
if (bLoad_From_EEPOM)
- tmpValue = eprom_read(dev,
(EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 + 2) >> 1);
+ tmpValue = eprom_read(dev,
(EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 + 2) >> 1);
else
tmpValue = 0x10;
priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[2] = (u8)tmpValue;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
index 437bb9212e47..4cf3a7fc705e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK 0x23 //0x23
#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G 0x24 //0x24~0x26
#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 0x29 //0x29~0x2B
-#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 0x2C //0x2C~0x2E
+#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 0x2C //0x2C~0x2E
#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_Ver 0x27 //0x27
#define EEPROM_Default_ThermalMeter 0x7
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
