Rename the constant EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 to
EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1, this clears the checkpatch issue with
CamelCase naming.
This is purely a coding style change which should have no impact
on runtime code execution.
Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitm...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 4 ++--
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
index 3742dd8410b2..67b4597d351e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
@@ -2498,7 +2498,7 @@ static int rtl8192_read_eeprom_info(struct net_device
*dev)
}
} else if (priv->EEPROM_Def_Ver == 1) {
if (bLoad_From_EEPOM) {
- ret = eprom_read(dev, EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1
>> 1);
+ ret = eprom_read(dev, EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1
>> 1);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
tmpValue = ((u16)ret & 0xff00) >> 8;
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ static int rtl8192_read_eeprom_info(struct net_device
*dev)
priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelCCK_V1[0] = (u8)tmpValue;
if (bLoad_From_EEPOM) {
- ret = eprom_read(dev, (EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1
+ 2) >> 1);
+ ret = eprom_read(dev,
(EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1 + 2) >> 1);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
tmpValue = (u16)ret;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
index a7d1a7f9faf0..d7f830bf9e94 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK 0x23 //0x23
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G 0x24 //0x24~0x26
-#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 0x29 //0x29~0x2B
+#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1 0x29 //0x29~0x2B
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 0x2C //0x2C~0x2E
#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_Ver 0x27 //0x27
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
