On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:05:03 +0100 (CET)
> Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > > > (This isn't the worst one, but it just happens to be one of the first.)
> > > > There are many cases where the typical style would be to declare a new
> > > > varia
Hi Julia,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:05:03 +0100 (CET)
Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > (This isn't the worst one, but it just happens to be one of the first.)
> > > There are many cases where the typical style would be to declare a new
> > > variable at the top of the function, where you perform the
> > >
> > (This isn't the worst one, but it just happens to be one of the first.)
> > There are many cases where the typical style would be to declare a new
> > variable at the top of the function, where you perform the
> > macro/function-call to convert from one abstraction to another. Like
> >
> > stat
Hi Brian,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:00:19 -0800
Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:37:47PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > struct nand_chip now embeds an mtd device. Patch all drivers to make use
> > of this mtd instance instead of using the instance embedded in their
Hi Boris,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:37:47PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> struct nand_chip now embeds an mtd device. Patch all drivers to make use
> of this mtd instance instead of using the instance embedded in their
> private struct or dynamically allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillo
struct nand_chip now embeds an mtd device. Patch all drivers to make use
of this mtd instance instead of using the instance embedded in their
private struct or dynamically allocated.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon
Cc: Julia Lawall
---
Most of those changes were generate with this coccinelle scri
