On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:21:45PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> can this strcpy_s() replaced with strlcpy ?
>
These functions obviously should be removed, yes. Please send a patch
for that and we can drop my patches. Give David reported-by credit.
regards,
dan carpenter
Am 15.05.2017 12:01, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> We're putting the NUL terminators one space beyond where they belong.
> This doesn't show up in testing because all but the callers put a NUL in
> the correct place themselves. LOL. It causes a static checker warning
> about buffer overflows.
>
>
We're putting the NUL terminators one space beyond where they belong.
This doesn't show up in testing because all but the callers put a NUL in
the correct place themselves. LOL. It causes a static checker warning
about buffer overflows.
Fixes: a49d25364dfb ("staging/atomisp: Add support for the
