On 05/11/17 12:24, Johan Hovold wrote:
+ if (error) {
gb->error++;
+ gb->iteration_count++;
+ }
And this looks like an unrelated bug fix that should go in it's own
patch, right?
I pinged
On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:27:39AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Loopback has its own internal method for tracking and timing out
> asynchronous operations however previous patches make it possible to use
> functionality provided by operation.c to do this instead. Using the code in
>
Loopback has its own internal method for tracking and timing out
asynchronous operations however previous patches make it possible to use
functionality provided by operation.c to do this instead. Using the code in
operation.c means we can completely subtract the timer, the work-queue, the
kref and
