On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:59:34AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:12:40AM +0300, Vladimirs Ambrosovs wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:25:07AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:19:58AM +0300, Vladimirs Ambrosovs wrote:
Check for zero was added
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:12:40AM +0300, Vladimirs Ambrosovs wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:25:07AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:19:58AM +0300, Vladimirs Ambrosovs wrote:
Check for zero was added to the module parameter instances to
avoid the allocation of
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:19:58AM +0300, Vladimirs Ambrosovs wrote:
Check for zero was added to the module parameter instances to
avoid the allocation of array of zero values. Although it is a valid call,
we don't want to allocate ZERO_SIZE_PTR, so need to disallow this case.
The type of
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:25:07AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:19:58AM +0300, Vladimirs Ambrosovs wrote:
Check for zero was added to the module parameter instances to
avoid the allocation of array of zero values. Although it is a valid call,
we don't want to
Check for zero was added to the module parameter instances to
avoid the allocation of array of zero values. Although it is a valid call,
we don't want to allocate ZERO_SIZE_PTR, so need to disallow this case.
The type of variables which are compared to instances were also changed
to unsigned int
