On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:04:33PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 05:15 AM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
> > On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>
> >> And "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/; is preferred
> >
> > Is it? I don't mind it either way, but since we do "GPLv2
On 06/15/2016 05:15 AM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> And "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/; is preferred
>
> Is it? I don't mind it either way, but since we do "GPLv2 only",
> seemed to make sense to only link to that?
Shorter and less prone to
On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
>> http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/docs/GPLv2.pdf is no
>> longer around, so replace it with (hopefully more permanent)
>> http://http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
>^^
>
>> [...]
>>
http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/docs/GPLv2.pdf is no
longer around, so replace it with (hopefully more permanent)
http://http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
Reported-by: Xose Vazquez Perez
---