> On 03/08/2017 08:49 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> >> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> >>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> >>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> >>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> >>> refcounter overfl
On 03/08/2017 08:49 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
>>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
>>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
>>> refcounter overflows that migh
> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> > situations.
> >
> >
On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: E
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand
Signed-off-
