Hi Dan,
On 2019/1/16 18:45, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:59:54PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> It is more suitable to update in erofs_workgroup_get since
>> it's actually the one matched with erofs_workgroup_put.
>>
>
> This patch is fine. No need to resend.
>
> Reviewed-by:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:59:54PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> It is more suitable to update in erofs_workgroup_get since
> it's actually the one matched with erofs_workgroup_put.
>
This patch is fine. No need to resend.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter
But for future reference, I found the commit
On 2019/1/16 16:59, Gao Xiang wrote:
> It is more suitable to update in erofs_workgroup_get since
> it's actually the one matched with erofs_workgroup_put.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
Thanks,
___
devel mailing list
It is more suitable to update in erofs_workgroup_get since
it's actually the one matched with erofs_workgroup_put.
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang
---
drivers/staging/erofs/utils.c | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/utils.c
