Hi,
On Friday 20 September 2013 04:41 AM, Russell King wrote:
The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is
not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use
dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only arch and bus code should access this
member directly.
Convert all direc
Hey,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:00:18PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Another would be if subsystem maintainers are happy that I carry them,
> I can add the acks, and then later on towards the end of the cycle,
> provide a branch subsystem maintainers could pull.
>
> Or... if you can t
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:16:52AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is
> > not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use
> > dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only ar
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:16:52AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is
> > not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use
> > dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only ar
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is
> not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use
> dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only arch and bus code should access this
> member directly.
>
> Convert
The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is
not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use
dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only arch and bus code should access this
member directly.
Convert all direct write accesses to using the correct API.
Signed-off-by: Russel
