I sent a patch for this six hours ago:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10268591/
--
Gustavo
On 03/09/2018 12:11 AM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:01:07PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 16:50 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
The kernel would like to have
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:16:21AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> I sent a patch for this six hours ago:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10268591/
>
> --
> Gustavo
lol, I knew there would be a race on to fix these :) And you got it
right, bonus points. Let's drop this one then.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:01:07PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 16:50 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1]. The
> > arrays are fixed here (declared with a const variable) but they appear
> > like VLAs to the compiler.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:01:07PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 16:50 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1]. The
> > arrays are fixed here (declared with a const variable) but they appear
> > like VLAs to the compiler.
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 16:50 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1]. The
> arrays are fixed here (declared with a const variable) but they appear
> like VLAs to the compiler. We can use a pre-processor define to fix the
> warning.
[]
> diff
The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1]. The
arrays are fixed here (declared with a const variable) but they appear
like VLAs to the compiler. We can use a pre-processor define to fix the
warning.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding
--
