Hi Mauro,
I've rebased the patches now, but there is a slight hiccup. For patches 2
and 3 of this series there will now be a conflict with commit 9289cdf39992
("staging: media: atomisp: Convert to GPIO descriptors") in Greg's tree.
I'm not sure what the best way to handle this is? The merge confl
Em Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:09:07 +0100
Alex Dewar escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> I've rebased the patches now, but there is a slight hiccup. For patches 2
> and 3 of this series there will now be a conflict with commit 9289cdf39992
> ("staging: media: atomisp: Convert to GPIO descriptors") in Greg's tree
On 22/09/2020 10:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:09:07 +0100
Alex Dewar escreveu:
Hi Mauro,
I've rebased the patches now, but there is a slight hiccup. For patches 2
and 3 of this series there will now be a conflict with commit 9289cdf39992
("staging: media: atomisp: C
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:02:33PM +0100, Alex Dewar wrote:
> On 22/09/2020 10:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:09:07 +0100
> > Alex Dewar escreveu:
> >
> > > Hi Mauro,
> > >
> > > I've rebased the patches now, but there is a slight hiccup. For patches 2
> > > and 3 of
[snip]
> > That sounds more sensible. I've also just noticed that I introduced a bug in
> > the first patch when rebasing it :-/, so let's hold off on the whole series
> > and I'll do a proper tidy and resend after the next merge window.
>
> Is the bug the memory leak if lm3554_platform_data_func(
