On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:36:51PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 20:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 16:59 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 02:31:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Actually, my patch seems like a good idea to me
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 03:34:08PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 16:59 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 02:31:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:20
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:05:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Its a 64 on 64 or 32 on 32 virtual machine. Goldfish is used for Android
emulation for all the system level phone emulation tools. On the
emulation side it provides an interface for the emulated OS but makes no
effort to emulate it as
Actually, my patch seems like a good idea to me but it's one of those
things that someone should probably test. Unless someone can test
goldfish on a 32 bit system with 64 bit dma addresses then maybe the
thing to is to write the new function but preserve the current behavior.
static inline void
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Actually, my patch seems like a good idea to me but it's one of those
things that someone should probably test. Unless someone can test
goldfish on a 32 bit system with 64 bit dma addresses
No such system exists.
Alan
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 02:31:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Actually, my patch seems like a good idea to me but it's one of those
things that someone should probably test. Unless someone can test
goldfish on a 32 bit system with 64 bit
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 16:59 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 02:31:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Actually, my patch seems like a good idea to me but it's one of those
things that someone should probably test. Unless
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
--- a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct goldfish_audio {
#define AUDIO_READ(data, addr) (readl(data-reg_base + addr))
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 20:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
--- a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
+++
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
--- a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct goldfish_audio {
As the first argument of gf_write64() was of type unsigned long, and as
some calls to gf_write64() were casting the first argument from void *
to u64 the compiler and/or sparse were printing warnings for casts of
wrong sizes when compiling for i386.
This patch changes the type of the first
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 20:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
