Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 02:14:47PM CET, ido...@mellanox.com wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09:52AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch series finishes by the removal of switchdev_ops. To get there
>> we convert the existing switchdev_port_attr_{set,get} switchdev_ops to
>>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09:52AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series finishes by the removal of switchdev_ops. To get there
> we convert the existing switchdev_port_attr_{set,get} switchdev_ops to
> use a blocking notifier, thus making it consistent with how the object
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:16:57PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:09:52 -0800
>
> > David, I would like to get Ido's feedback on this to make sure I did not
> > miss something, thank you!
>
> Ok, Ido please look at this when you can.
Will review
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:09:52 -0800
> David, I would like to get Ido's feedback on this to make sure I did not
> miss something, thank you!
Ok, Ido please look at this when you can.
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproje
Hi all,
This patch series finishes by the removal of switchdev_ops. To get there
we convert the existing switchdev_port_attr_{set,get} switchdev_ops to
use a blocking notifier, thus making it consistent with how the objects
are pushed to the switchdev enabled devices.
Please review and let me kno
