On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Octavian Purdila
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
Assuming you are talking about a kernel compat layer that
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
Assuming you are talking about a kernel compat layer that translates
the flat_binder_object structs as they pass between 32 bit and 64 bit
processes, that will not always work. The data portion of the message
sometimes
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
Assuming you are talking about a kernel compat layer that translates
the flat_binder_object structs as they pass between 32 bit and 64
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Octavian Purdila tavi.purd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:55:34PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg a...@android.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:55:34PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec
Hi all,
Thanks for your feedback! Sadly enough, being in a different time-zone,
is not useful.
Sorry for the confusion related to why is this patch needed or not. I
should highlight a bit more what is the patch enabling and what would be
the different alternatives, at least from my
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 06:31:25PM +, Serban Constantinescu wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for your feedback! Sadly enough, being in a different
time-zone, is not useful.
Sorry for the confusion related to why is this patch needed or not. I
should highlight a bit more what is the patch
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:09:41PM +, Serban Constantinescu wrote:
+#define size_helper(x) ({\
+ size_t __size; \
+ if (!is_compat_task())
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
snip
And finally, is this all really needed? Why not just fix the structures
to be correct, and then fix userspace to use the correct structures as
well, thereby not needing a compat layer at all?
Some of the binder
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:46:42PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
snip
And finally, is this all really needed? Why not just fix the structures
to
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:55:34PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:46:42PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org
wrote:
snip
And
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:55:34PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:46:42PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:35:54 -0800
Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:09:41PM +, Serban Constantinescu wrote:
+#define size_helper(x) ({ \
+ size_t __size;
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:22:13PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:55:34PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at
None of this (the patch series or the original code) is mine. My
Sorry mistraced the attribution sequence
question was more of a general one on designing ioctls, as well as
concerns with changing the existing 32-bit api.
I think in general my advice would be:
If its already been screwed up
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:55:34PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:46:42PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at
18 matches
Mail list logo
