On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:47:14AM +, Horia Geantă wrote:
> On 4/28/2017 1:32 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 09:44:49AM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
> >> When checking the response verb, the valid bit should be masked out,
> >> since its value flips depending on what Response
On 4/28/2017 1:32 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 09:44:49AM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
>> When checking the response verb, the valid bit should be masked out,
>> since its value flips depending on what Response Register
>> (RR0 /RR1) it's been read from.
>>
>> Fixes: 321eecb06bfb
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 09:44:49AM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
> When checking the response verb, the valid bit should be masked out,
> since its value flips depending on what Response Register
> (RR0 /RR1) it's been read from.
>
> Fixes: 321eecb06bfb ("bus: fsl-mc: dpio: add QBMan portal APIs for
When checking the response verb, the valid bit should be masked out,
since its value flips depending on what Response Register
(RR0 /RR1) it's been read from.
Fixes: 321eecb06bfb ("bus: fsl-mc: dpio: add QBMan portal APIs for DPAA2")
Signed-off-by: Horia Geantă
---
v2: use