On 4/18/19 1:27 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:44:40PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
>> in order to avoid any potential type mistakes, in particular in the
>> context in which this code is being
Oi Gustavo,
Thanks for the patch, and the rebasing.
On Wed 17 Apr 2019 at 19:44, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded
version
in order to avoid any potential type mistakes, in particular in
the
context in which this code is being used.
So,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:44:40PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
> in order to avoid any potential type mistakes, in particular in the
> context in which this code is being used.
>
> So, replace code of the following
Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
in order to avoid any potential type mistakes, in particular in the
context in which this code is being used.
So, replace code of the following form:
sizeof(*resp) + props_count * sizeof(struct gb_power_supply_props_desc)
