Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-28 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Steve, Btw. I think probably a smaller list of recipients would be just fine on the next version. On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:16:06AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve L

Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-28 Thread Steve Longerbeam
Hi Sakari, On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi Steve, On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement notifier ops (bind, unbind).

Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-26 Thread Sakari Ailus
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:50:04PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > > > Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_

Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-26 Thread Steve Longerbeam
Hi Sakari, Thanks for the feedback. On 2/25/20 7:07 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: Hi Steve, On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement no

Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-25 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Steve, On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:41:21AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), > have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement > notifier ops (bind, unbind). > > The caller is now responsible for first init

[RESEND PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-15 Thread Steve Longerbeam
Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement notifier ops (bind, unbind). The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a call to v4l2_async_notifier_init(). Signed-off-by: Steve

Re: [PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 03:49:03PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), > have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement > notifier ops (bind, unbind). > > The caller is now responsible for first initializing it

[PATCH v3 02/17] media: v4l2-fwnode: Pass notifier to v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev()

2020-02-04 Thread Steve Longerbeam
Instead of allocating a notifier in v4l2_async_register_fwnode_subdev(), have the caller provide one. This allows the caller to implement notifier ops (bind, unbind). The caller is now responsible for first initializing its notifier with a call to v4l2_async_notifier_init(). Signed-off-by: Steve