Hi Mauro,
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 08:44 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:27:42 +0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
>
> > Em Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:18:32 -0300
> > Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:08 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > On
Em Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:27:42 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:18:32 -0300
> Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
>
> > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:08 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 2021-04-27 11:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > > Despite other *_get()/*_put()
Em Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:18:32 -0300
Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:08 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2021-04-27 11:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Despite other *_get()/*_put() functions, where usage count is
> > > incremented only if not errors, the
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:08 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-04-27 11:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Despite other *_get()/*_put() functions, where usage count is
> > incremented only if not errors, the pm_runtime_get_sync() has
> > a different behavior, incrementing the counter *even*
On 2021-04-27 11:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Despite other *_get()/*_put() functions, where usage count is
incremented only if not errors, the pm_runtime_get_sync() has
a different behavior, incrementing the counter *even* on
errors.
That's an error prone behavior, as people often forget
Despite other *_get()/*_put() functions, where usage count is
incremented only if not errors, the pm_runtime_get_sync() has
a different behavior, incrementing the counter *even* on
errors.
That's an error prone behavior, as people often forget to
decrement the usage counter.
However, the hantro
