On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 17:00 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 07:18:15AM +, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
>
> > One example (for spi-cpha):
> > if (of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-cpha", &tmp) == 0) {
> > spi->mode |= SPI_CPHA_OVERRIDE;
> > i
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 07:18:15AM +, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
> One example (for spi-cpha):
> if (of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-cpha", &tmp) == 0) {
> spi->mode |= SPI_CPHA_OVERRIDE;
> if (tmp)
> spi->mode |= SPI_CPHA;
We could al
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 04:51:54PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> If the driver picks a mode because that's what it says on the datasheet
> it prevents odd board configurations from working. The question
> becomes whether it makes sense in general to assume those odd board
> conditions don't ex
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 16:51 +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:38:50 +
> Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 11:40:32AM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > > +CC Mark as we probably need a more general view point on
> > > the question of whether SPI mode sh
On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 11:40:32AM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> +CC Mark as we probably need a more general view point on
> the question of whether SPI mode should be enforced by binding
> or in the driver.
Not sure I see the question here, I think I was missing a bit of
the conversation? It
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:38:50 +
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 11:40:32AM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> > +CC Mark as we probably need a more general view point on
> > the question of whether SPI mode should be enforced by binding
> > or in the driver.
>
> Not sure I see t
+CC Mark as we probably need a more general view point on
the question of whether SPI mode should be enforced by binding
or in the driver.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:51:30 +
"Ardelean, Alexandru" wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-11-23 at 11:41 +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 02:19:
On Sat, 2019-11-23 at 11:41 +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 02:19:27 -0300
> Rodrigo Carvalho wrote:
>
> > This patch add device tree binding documentation for ADIS16240.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Ribeiro Carvalho
My bad for the late timing on this.
I'm slightly more
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 02:19:27 -0300
Rodrigo Carvalho wrote:
> This patch add device tree binding documentation for ADIS16240.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Ribeiro Carvalho
No problem with this patch, but I definitely want to see an accompanying
one enforcing the SPI mode in the driver.
Right now
This patch add device tree binding documentation for ADIS16240.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Ribeiro Carvalho
---
V4:
- Remove spi-cpha and spi-cpol in binding example, since this driver
supports only one timing mode.
.../bindings/iio/accel/adi,adis16240.yaml | 49 +++
1 file ch
10 matches
Mail list logo
