On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:57:05PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:18:24AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > No one objects to this.
> >
> > Resend it, but without the RFC in the subject. Greg has a no RFC rule,
> > probably he has to edit the subject.
>
> Apparently Greg
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:18:24AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> No one objects to this.
>
> Resend it, but without the RFC in the subject. Greg has a no RFC rule,
> probably he has to edit the subject.
Apparently Greg already applied it.
regards,
dan carpenter
No one objects to this.
Resend it, but without the RFC in the subject. Greg has a no RFC rule,
probably he has to edit the subject.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mail
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:35:25PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The android drivers have a few other people reviewing patches.
> Add a separate entry to ensure patches go to the right people.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
> ---
> Sumit and I have been doing review anyway so I think it makes sen
The android drivers have a few other people reviewing patches.
Add a separate entry to ensure patches go to the right people.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
Sumit and I have been doing review anyway so I think it makes sense for
us to be cc-ed on patches in addition to the generic Android mainta
