On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Christopher Li spa...@chrisli.org wrote:
So if there is a bug, It is sparse did not know exactly which part
of the code is dead on AST level. If you enable the #if 0 inside
I am thinking about how to fix the dead code issue. Try to do more
than trivial dead code
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Christopher Li spa...@chrisli.org wrote:
The warning should be trivial in instruction level. We are looking
for an instruction has larger than type size constant shift
value.
Actually, just try it. Not as trivial as I thought.
The problem is that, in the
Sorry for the late reply.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:45 PM, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:24:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Let's forward this to the Sparse mailing list.
We're seeing a Sparse false positive testing
No, this is a valid complain. See my point
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:07:48AM -0700, Christopher Li wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:45 PM, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:24:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Let's forward this to the Sparse mailing list.
We're seeing a Sparse false positive testing
No,
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Except that filter has an int channel (signed), so it can
successfully test channel 0 and return early; it'll never call
ni_stc_dma_channel_select_bitfield(channel) with a negative number.
I do agree that this code
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 09:32:27PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
diff --git a/expand.c b/expand.c
index 0f6720c..4a96de4 100644
--- a/expand.c
+++ b/expand.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int simplify_int_binop(struct expression *expr,
struct symbol *ctype)
return 0;
r =
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:40:19AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 09:32:27PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
diff --git a/expand.c b/expand.c
index 0f6720c..4a96de4 100644
--- a/expand.c
+++ b/expand.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int simplify_int_binop(struct expression
Hi Josh.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:45:29PM -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:24:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Let's forward this to the Sparse mailing list.
We're seeing a Sparse false positive testing
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_pcimio.c.
Let's forward this to the Sparse mailing list.
We're seeing a Sparse false positive testing
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_pcimio.c.
CHECK drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_pcimio.c
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_stc.h:720:26: warning: shift too big
(4294967295) for type int
On Monday, June 09, 2014 10:48 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:24:35PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote:
Fixes warning static analysis warning raised by sparse in
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_stc.h
warning: shift too big (4294967295) for type int
This warning
10 matches
Mail list logo
