Pkshih writes:
>> My recommendation is to avoid accumulating patches at all cost and start
>> submitting them as soon as you can. This way you get patches committed
>> much more smoother. So do not wait until _all_ patches are ready,
>> instead start submitting patches as soon as you have _some_
el...@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Two rtlwifi drivers?
>
> Hi PK,
>
> you got good answers already so only short reply from me:
>
> Pkshih writes:
>
> > 3) Coming drivers -- rtl8723de and rtl8821ce
> >We're devel
el...@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Two rtlwifi drivers?
>
>
> > 4) As Kalle mentioned, rtlwifi contains many magic numbers, and I
> >plan to fix them after rtl8723de and rtl8821ce. Because the drivers
> >are developing,
Hi PK,
you got good answers already so only short reply from me:
Pkshih writes:
> 3) Coming drivers -- rtl8723de and rtl8821ce
>We're developing the two drivers, and rtl8723de and rtl8821ce will
>be ready on 2017Q4 and 2018Q1 respectively. The drivers are based on
>rtl8822be that in
Am 16.10.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Kalle Valo:
> Oleksij Rempel writes:
>
>>> 4) As Kalle mentioned, rtlwifi contains many magic numbers, and I
>>>plan to fix them after rtl8723de and rtl8821ce. Because the drivers
>>>are developing, the changes will make us hard to integrate. However,
>>>
Oleksij Rempel writes:
>> 4) As Kalle mentioned, rtlwifi contains many magic numbers, and I
>>plan to fix them after rtl8723de and rtl8821ce. Because the drivers
>>are developing, the changes will make us hard to integrate. However,
>>I don't have plan to process the magic numbers in
Dan Carpenter writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:41:38AM +, Pkshih wrote:
>> 2) The rtlwifi in staging
>>In staging, the module phydm v13 contains bugs, so I want to upgrade
>>to v21 (Realtek internal version number). This upgrade contains a
>>big patch that the difference betwe
Pkshih; 莊彥宣; Johannes Berg; Souptick
> > Joarder;
> > de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org;
> > kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: Two rtlwifi drivers?
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:38:06AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> &
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:41:38AM +, Pkshih wrote:
> 2) The rtlwifi in staging
>In staging, the module phydm v13 contains bugs, so I want to upgrade
>to v21 (Realtek internal version number). This upgrade contains a
>big patch that the difference between v13 and v21, and there are
arpenter; Pkshih; 莊彥宣; Johannes Berg; Souptick
>> Joarder;
>> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org;
>> kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: Two rtlwifi drivers?
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:38:06AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
..@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Two rtlwifi drivers?
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:38:06AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > So what to do? Any ideas? What makes your life easier? You can just
> > > ignore the staging tree, as it sh
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:38:06AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > So what to do? Any ideas? What makes your life easier? You can just
> > ignore the staging tree, as it should not affect your portion of the
> > kernel at all, right?
>
> Yes, I automatically ignore anything staging related. But th
Larry Finger writes:
> On 10/11/2017 08:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:06:00PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> I think it's horrid too. But, if no one is able to do the real work
>> here, we hurt users who just need to use their hardware to get things
>> done.
>>
>>
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>> >> I'm getting slightly annoyed that we now apparently have two duplicate
>> >> rtlwifi drivers (with the same name!) and I'm being spammed by staging
>> >> patches. Was this really a smart thing to do? And what will be the
>> >> future of these two drivers?
>> >>
>>
On 10/11/2017 08:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:06:00PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
(Sorry for taking so long with the reply, I wanted first to check what
the rtlwifi in staging contains.)
Larry Finger writes:
On 08/24/2017 07:14 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Dan Carpenter
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> And it seems like the company isn't willing to do the real work, so
> dumping this in staging is the best we can do at the moment.
I'm more optimistic. There are a lot of @realtek.com addresses in the
CC list and that's a new t
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:06:00PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (Sorry for taking so long with the reply, I wanted first to check what
> the rtlwifi in staging contains.)
>
> Larry Finger writes:
>
> > On 08/24/2017 07:14 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> Dan Carpenter writes:
> >>
> >>> Smatch is distr
(Sorry for taking so long with the reply, I wanted first to check what
the rtlwifi in staging contains.)
Larry Finger writes:
> On 08/24/2017 07:14 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Dan Carpenter writes:
>>
>>> Smatch is distrustful of the "capab" value and marks it as user
>>> controlled. I think it a
On 08/24/2017 07:14 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Dan Carpenter writes:
Smatch is distrustful of the "capab" value and marks it as user
controlled. I think it actually comes from the firmware? Anyway, I
looked at other drivers and they added a bounds check and it seems like
a harmless thing to have
19 matches
Mail list logo
