On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:43:56PM +0530, Ranjith wrote:
> +#define ADC_GAIN_2 (BIT(5) & (~BIT(4)))
It looks really weird to write it this way...
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driver
On Monday, November 09, 2015 10:14 AM, Ranjith wrote:
> BIT macro is used for defining BIT location instead of
> shifting operator - coding style issue
>
> Signed-off-by: Ranjith
This has already been fixed. Please base your patches on linux-next
or Greg Kroah-Hartman's staging-next tree.
Also,
