On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:00:25 +0200
Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:09:59PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Well, I gave two alternatives :-)
> >
> > Both are fine as far as I am concerned, but it would be nice to hear
> > what others think.
>
> In fact I think both are g
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:09:59PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Well, I gave two alternatives :-)
>
> Both are fine as far as I am concerned, but it would be nice to hear
> what others think.
In fact I think both are good options. :-)
I'd perhaps lean towards the latter, for it has the bene
Well, I gave two alternatives :-)
Both are fine as far as I am concerned, but it would be nice to hear
what others think.
Regards,
Hans
On 11/04/14 11:45, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:20:40 +0100
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> On 11/04/14 1
Hi Hans,
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:20:40 +0100
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 11/04/14 10:54, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Rename mediabus formats and move the enum into a separate header file so
> > that it can be used by DRM/KMS subsystem without any reference to the V4L2
> > subsystem.
>
Hi Boris,
On 11/04/14 10:54, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Rename mediabus formats and move the enum into a separate header file so
> that it can be used by DRM/KMS subsystem without any reference to the V4L2
> subsystem.
>
> Old V4L2_MBUS_FMT_ definitions are now referencing MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ value.
I
On 11/04/14 11:20, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 11/04/14 10:54, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> Rename mediabus formats and move the enum into a separate header file so
>> that it can be used by DRM/KMS subsystem without any reference to the V4L2
>> subsystem.
>>
>> Old V4L2_MBUS_FMT_ defini
