On Wed 02-09-15 18:06:20, Greg KH wrote:
[...]
> And if we aren't taking patch 1/2, I guess this one isn't needed either?
Unlike the patch1 which was pretty much cosmetic this fixes a real
issue.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
___
devel mailing list
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 02-09-15 18:06:20, Greg KH wrote:
> [...]
> > And if we aren't taking patch 1/2, I guess this one isn't needed either?
>
> Unlike the patch1 which was pretty much cosmetic this fixes a real
> issue.
Ok, then it would be great
Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 02-09-15 18:06:20, Greg KH wrote:
> > [...]
> > > And if we aren't taking patch 1/2, I guess this one isn't needed either?
> >
> > Unlike the patch1 which was pretty much cosmetic this fixes a real
> >
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 03:06:46AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 02-09-15 18:06:20, Greg KH wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > And if we aren't taking patch 1/2, I guess this one isn't needed either?
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:19:48PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Should selected_tasksize be added to rem even when TIF_MEMDIE was not set?
>
> Please see a thread from http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg93246.html
> if you want to know why to reverse the order.
>
On Thu 27-08-15 00:34:47, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Reposting updated version as it turned out that we can call do_send_sig_info()
with task_lock held. ;-) ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmm=144059948628905w=2
)
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Should selected_tasksize be added to rem even when TIF_MEMDIE was
Reposting updated version as it turned out that we can call do_send_sig_info()
with task_lock held. ;-) ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmm=144059948628905w=2 )
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Should selected_tasksize be added to rem even when TIF_MEMDIE was not set?
Commit e1099a69a624 android, lmk: avoid
