On 2/15/19 11:01 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:51 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
Hi John,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:38:29AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
[snip]
Some thoughts, as this ABI break has the potential to be pretty painful.
1) Unfortunately, this ABI is exposed *throu
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:01:59AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:51 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:38:29AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Some thoughts, as this ABI break has the potential to be pretty painf
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:51 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:38:29AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> > Some thoughts, as this ABI break has the potential to be pretty painful.
> >
> > 1) Unfortunately, this ABI is exposed *through* libion via
> > ion_
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:52 PM Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 2/15/19 1:58 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > So yea, I don't think we should tie our hands in reworking the
> > interfaces, but it would be nice to avoid having subtle ABI changes
> > that don't have clear ways for userland to detect which in
On 2/15/19 1:58 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:22 AM Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>
>> On 2/15/19 1:01 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:51 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:38:29AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> 2) For patches that cause
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:22 AM Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>
> On 2/15/19 1:01 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:51 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:38:29AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> >>> 2) For patches that cause ABI breaks, it might be good to make it
> >
On 2/15/19 1:01 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:51 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:38:29AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Some thoughts, as this ABI break has the potential to be pretty painful.
>>>
>>> 1) Unfortunately, th
Hi John,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:38:29AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>
[snip]
> Some thoughts, as this ABI break has the potential to be pretty painful.
>
> 1) Unfortunately, this ABI is exposed *through* libion via
> ion_alloc/ion_alloc_fd out to gralloc implementations. Which means it
> will
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:44 PM Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>
> Previously the heap to allocate from was selected by a mask of allowed
> heap types. This may have been done as a primitive form of constraint
> solving, the first heap type that matched any set bit of the heap mask
> was allocated from, u
