gt;
>> GE imagination at work
>>
>> GE Intelligent Platforms Ltd, registered in England and Wales (3828642) at
>> 100 Barbirolli Square, Manchester, M2 3AB, VAT GB 927 5591 89
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Maurice Moss [mailto:ei
Message-
>> From: Maurice Moss [mailto:eightplusc...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 08 November 2014 00:33
>> To: Welch, Martyn (GE Intelligent Platforms)
>> Cc: Manohar Vanga; dan.carpen...@oracle.com; driverdev-
>> de...@linuxdriverproject.org
>> Subject: Re: XVME 6300
il.com]
> Sent: 08 November 2014 00:33
> To: Welch, Martyn (GE Intelligent Platforms)
> Cc: Manohar Vanga; dan.carpen...@oracle.com; driverdev-
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> Subject: Re: XVME 6300 with TSI148 bridge on 64 bit Debian (Linux 3.2.57)
> vme_user issue
>
>
Hi Manohar/Dan,
Any idea regarding this?
Cheers,
Maurice
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Maurice Moss wrote:
> Hi Martyn,
>
> Thanks for your help from previous emails. I managed to talk to my
> board using a VME-USB board. Now I am back to working with an SBC, and
> I have a different setup t
Hi Martyn,
Thanks for your help from previous emails. I managed to talk to my
board using a VME-USB board. Now I am back to working with an SBC, and
I have a different setup this time around, let me describe it:
1. SBC in slot 0 of a VME64 chassis (with 2 slots), and the bottom one
being a slot
On 23/07/14 03:09, Maurice Moss wrote:
Hi Martyn,
Thanks for your patience with me. I have a couple of questions for you:
0. I put the SBC with the right settings for Geographical addressing.
I did 2 tests by setting the board in each of the 2 slots available on
my rack and the geo address was
Hi Martyn,
Thanks for your patience with me. I have a couple of questions for you:
0. I put the SBC with the right settings for Geographical addressing.
I did 2 tests by setting the board in each of the 2 slots available on
my rack and the geo address was detected as 0 in both the cases. This
m
On 14/07/14 19:29, Maurice Moss wrote:
Hi all,
I have updated my Linux Kernel to the latest. I am on Debian 64bit
3.15.5. I issue the following Kernel command line, and the vme_user
module seems to load correctly, however the vme bus is neither mounted
on /dev nor /proc.
Just to make sure
Hi all,
I have updated my Linux Kernel to the latest. I am on Debian 64bit
3.15.5. I issue the following Kernel command line, and the vme_user
module seems to load correctly, however the vme bus is neither mounted
on /dev nor /proc.
I was earlier using a 3.2 debian 32bit and managed to mount th
Martyn,
OK. I feel like I am not clear. The kernel command line has a space,
but the line here in the email doesn't (I don't know how that
happened). I am still stuck with the same issue.
Sorry for all the confusion
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Maurice Moss wrote:
> Yes, copy and paste i
Yes, copy and paste issue, I had double checked that right after I
sent you the mail. Sorry!!
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Martyn Welch wrote:
>
>
> On 03/07/14 00:47, Maurice Moss wrote:
>>
>> I upgraded to linux kernel 3.14.9 (on Fedora). Re-compiled the kernel
>> with the vme support etc.
On 03/07/14 00:47, Maurice Moss wrote:
I upgraded to linux kernel 3.14.9 (on Fedora). Re-compiled the kernel
with the vme support etc. I now get the below in my log, and don't
see any vme related files in /dev !!
[0.00] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.14.9
root=UUID=aee6e5
Hi Martyn,
Thanks a lot for your guidance. I am back working on vme and I am
trying it with a newer kernel, and I seem to have gone backwards!
I upgraded to linux kernel 3.14.9 (on Fedora). Re-compiled the kernel
with the vme support etc. I now get the below in my log, and don't
see any vme re
On 23/06/14 16:05, Maurice Moss wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for your reply. I have been away the last few weeks.
Dan, I am using 64 bit Debian 3.2.57. So I am not using the latest
kernel. Would this be a problem?
That's probably quite old now. Depending on your hardware there may be
important
Hi All,
Thanks for your reply. I have been away the last few weeks.
Dan, I am using 64 bit Debian 3.2.57. So I am not using the latest
kernel. Would this be a problem?
Martyn, I don't have a bus analyzer. I believe I have understood a
few more things about my setup, but I still manage to han
Hi Maurice,
On 04/06/14 22:43, Maurice Moss wrote:
Dear All,
I came across the link here and decided to write to you, as I am
facing a very similar problem:
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2013-May/037941.html
With the above linux, I have recompiled the kernel
I have added Martyn and Manohar to the CC list since they might know the
answer. Are you using the latest kernel, btw?
regards,
dan carpenter
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 02:43:29PM -0700, Maurice Moss wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I came across the link here and decided to write to you, as I am
> facing a
Dear All,
I came across the link here and decided to write to you, as I am
facing a very similar problem:
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2013-May/037941.html
With the above linux, I have recompiled the kernel and booting the
image with a vme_user.bus=0 vme_tsi14
18 matches
Mail list logo
