Hi Catalin, Yes, that's what I was thinking of. I can implement it.
Cheers, Matt On 14 July 2014 2:56:17 am AWST, Catalin Patulea <c...@vv.carleton.ca> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Matt Johnston <m...@ucc.asn.au> wrote: >> I'm not really sure how to resolve it though. Maybe as a >> tradeoff the refcounting could just switch between LOWDELAY >> and no-tos-flags if there are TCP forwards going on, then >> BULK if there aren't TCP forwards? >Ok, so if I'm understanding correctly, the invariant would be something >like: > >if (connecting || ptys) tos = LOWDELAY; >else if (tcp_forwards) tos = 0; >else tos = BULK; > >This might be implemented cleverly so that it's only reapplied on 0/1 >transitions of ptys and tcp_forwards, but these would be the >high-level semantics?
