On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 at 08:02:01 +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
> On Thu 22/10/2015, at 1:21 am, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> Thanks. However on second thought, the downside of this solution is
>> that it might render remote systems unreachable after upgrade (at least
>> for the users not reading changel
On Thu 22/10/2015, at 1:21 am, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 at 22:11:43 +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
>> Thanks for pointing that out, I’ve made -sjk fail rather than be
>> dropped silently.
>
> Thanks. However on second thought, the downside of this solution is
> that it might rend
Hi Matt,
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 at 22:11:43 +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that out, I’ve made -sjk fail rather than be
> dropped silently.
Thanks. However on second thought, the downside of this solution is
that it might render remote systems unreachable after upgrade (at least
I’ve merged these 4 patches, thanks. Couple of changes HAVE_GETPASS not
HAVE_FUNC_GETPASS, and I’m testing HAVE_CRYPT since OSX (and I guess other
BSDs) don’t have crypt.h
Cheers,
Matt
> On Sat 10/10/2015, at 7:30 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> if the system doesn't support getpass, we still
Hi Guilhem,
Thanks for pointing that out, I’ve made -sjk fail rather than be dropped
silently.
I’ve applied the other patch to avoid MOTD when there’s a command.
Thanks,
Matt
> On Wed 14/10/2015, at 3:13 am, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's fine not to implement bundling in dropbear's
