On Thursday 23 October 2008 03:51:17 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 October 2008, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 October 2008 00:01:56 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > - if ((pid = fork()) == -1)
> > > +#ifdef __uClinux__
> > > + pid = vfork();
> > > +#else
> > > + pid = fork();
> > > +#e
On Thursday 23 October 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> execvp() is ok, even though that
> calls malloc() (in at least one Glibc version I looked at).
yes, most of the exec calls need memory in order to construct an argv[] based
on the function arguments. in glibc, i imagine that the memory leaked is
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2008 00:01:56 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > - if ((pid = fork()) == -1)
> > +#ifdef __uClinux__
> > + pid = vfork();
> > +#else
> > + pid = fork();
> > +#endif /* __uClinux__ */
> > + if (pid == -1)
> > fatal("do_local_cmd: fork: %s", strer
On Wednesday 22 October 2008, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2008 00:01:56 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > - if ((pid = fork()) == -1)
> > +#ifdef __uClinux__
> > + pid = vfork();
> > +#else
> > + pid = fork();
> > +#endif /* __uClinux__ */
> > + if (pid == -1)
> > fatal("
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 00:01:56 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - if ((pid = fork()) == -1)
> +#ifdef __uClinux__
> + pid = vfork();
> +#else
> + pid = fork();
> +#endif /* __uClinux__ */
> + if (pid == -1)
> fatal("do_local_cmd: fork: %s", strerror(errno));
If it's ever
On Wednesday 22 October 2008, Farrell Aultman wrote:
> Again, it would be better to do something like the following in includes.h:
> +#ifdef __uClinux__
> +#define exit(x) _exit(x)
> +#endif
no it wouldnt. _exit() is *only* for when the child of a vfork() needs to
exit without calling an exec fu
Again, it would be better to do something like the following in includes.h:
+#ifdef __uClinux__
+#define exit(x) _exit(x)
+#endif
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Farrell Aultman wrote:
> > > Betwee
On Saturday 20 September 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Farrell Aultman wrote:
> > Between dropbear-047 and dropbear-051 changes were made that
> > accounted for the fact that uClinux needs to use vfork instead of
> > fork. However, fork was not replaced with vfork in all places. I
> > moved the con
Farrell Aultman wrote:
> Between dropbear-047 and dropbear-051 changes were made that
> accounted for the fact that uClinux needs to use vfork instead of
> fork. However, fork was not replaced with vfork in all places. I
> moved the conditional preproccessor check for uClinux into the
> includes.
Between dropbear-047 and dropbear-051 changes were made that accounted for
the fact that uClinux
needs to use vfork instead of fork. However, fork was not replaced with
vfork in all places. I moved the
conditional preproccessor check for uClinux into the includes.h file, so
that fork is always re
10 matches
Mail list logo
