Hi Mark W,
Comments inline...
On 10/5/2010 8:43 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> In general I think the proposed progression is a good model.
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:38:40PM -0700, Mark Diggory wrote:
>[quoting Tim Donohue]
>>> (3) After 1.7, and once we are ready to start docs for a 1.8.0 r
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> In general I think the proposed progression is a good model.
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:38:40PM -0700, Mark Diggory wrote:
> [quoting Tim Donohue]
> > > (3) After 1.7, and once we are ready to start docs for a 1.8.0 release,
> > > we'll c
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Jeffrey Trimble wrote:
> Well, since I've been working on a few things, here's my $.03 worth
> (inflation, you know).
>
Wow, hard times, that's a 50% rate of inflation, I'm going to buy as much of
Jeffs opinion as I can with the anticipation that his ego may infla
See comments below.
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Tim Donohue wrote:
> It's worth mentioning that obviously we can work on new Documention in the
> regular area of the DSpace wiki as well
> (https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/). In fact, we may want to
> suggest that as a "best practice"
On 10/4/2010 6:59 PM, Jeffrey Trimble wrote:
> I may be hashing it over, but simply put, we are agreeing that:
>
> 1. The wiki will be the most current. And during the release cycle,
> we'll edit there and then generate
> a hard copy (PDF and statiic HTML).
Correct.
> 2. That static copies coul
In general I think the proposed progression is a good model.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:38:40PM -0700, Mark Diggory wrote:
[quoting Tim Donohue]
> > (3) After 1.7, and once we are ready to start docs for a 1.8.0 release,
> > we'll copy the "DSDOC" space into a "DSDOC1.7" wiki space as an archive
Well, since I've been working on a few things, here's my $.03 worth
(inflation, you know).
I may be hashing it over, but simply put, we are agreeing that:
1. The wiki will be the most current. And during the release cycle,
we'll edit there and then generate
a hard copy (PDF and statiic HTML
A few quick inline comments...
On 10/4/2010 4:38 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
> As for future versioning -- we really need to formalize this based on
> what we all feel is best. One possible option may be as follows:
>
> (1) "DSDOC" space
> (https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC/DSp
Inline
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Tim Donohue wrote:
> Hi Stuart & all,
>
> On 10/4/2010 2:54 PM, Stuart Lewis wrote:
> >
> > On 5/10/2010, at 6:29 AM, Mark Diggory wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:20 PM, wrote:
> >> Author: stuartlewis
> >>
> >>dspace/trunk/dspace/docs/c
Hi Stuart & all,
On 10/4/2010 2:54 PM, Stuart Lewis wrote:
>
> On 5/10/2010, at 6:29 AM, Mark Diggory wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:20 PM, wrote:
>> Author: stuartlewis
>>
>>dspace/trunk/dspace/docs/confluence/jspui.txt
>>dspace/trunk/dspace/docs/docbook/jspui.xml
>>dspace/tru
10 matches
Mail list logo
