+1 to what Pascal & helix84 said.
On 7/24/2014 5:40 AM, helix84 wrote:
> I completely agree with Pascal. HTML was designed for graceful
> degradation, we only need to check whether each DSpace feature works
> reasonably in browsers not supporting the HTML feature that it relies
> on.
>
>
> On Thu,
I completely agree with Pascal. HTML was designed for graceful
degradation, we only need to check whether each DSpace feature works
reasonably in browsers not supporting the HTML feature that it relies
on.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Pascal-Nicolas Becker
wrote:
> While checking the fall b
I think we should use HTML5 with fallbacks. G.e. we should think on
users using devices like a braille display.
In case of DS-1994 [1] we check if the Browser supports HTML5 File API
and HTML5 Drag&Drop. If it does not we fall back on the "old behavior".
Checking this with IE 9 I just saw, that
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Dspace-devel] Is HTML5 widespread enough for DSpace to depend on
it?
HTML5 brings some nice new features, and there is already proposed
code to use some of these in DSpace:
https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-1994
Has HTML5 penetrated the market to sufficient
] Is HTML5 widespread enough for DSpace to depend on
it?
HTML5 brings some nice new features, and there is already proposed
code to use some of these in DSpace:
https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-1994
Has HTML5 penetrated the market to sufficient extent that we can rely
on its av
HTML5 brings some nice new features, and there is already proposed
code to use some of these in DSpace:
https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-1994
Has HTML5 penetrated the market to sufficient extent that we can rely
on its availability?
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.ed
