All sounds good/correct to me, Mark.
- Tim
On 12/19/2013 8:28 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> o "Any changes must be Java 1.6 compliant."
> Didn't we move up to Java 1.7 for DSpace 4.0?
>
> o Should also mention Maven 3.x. I'm thinking of adding that to the
> dspace-parent POM as a requireme
o "Any changes must be Java 1.6 compliant."
Didn't we move up to Java 1.7 for DSpace 4.0?
o Should also mention Maven 3.x. I'm thinking of adding that to the
dspace-parent POM as a requirement so that earlier Maven releases
will complain.
o "Ideally, we'd also like User/Usage Documen
