Re: [Dspam-devel] ClamAV

2009-12-15 Thread RW
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:43:03 + Paul Cockings wrote: > Stevan Bajic' wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:31 + > > Paul Cockings wrote: > > > >> Why do we have two options for clamav? > >> > >> CLAMAV > >> CLAMAV_DEVEL > >> > >> > > We don't have that: > Ok, must be the freebsd por

Re: [Dspam-devel] ClamAV

2009-12-11 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:43:03 + > Von: Paul Cockings > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] ClamAV > Stevan Bajic' wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:31 + > > Paul Cockings wrote

Re: [Dspam-devel] ClamAV

2009-12-11 Thread Paul Cockings
Stevan Bajic' wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:31 + > Paul Cockings wrote: > > >> Why do we have two options for clamav? >> >> CLAMAV >> CLAMAV_DEVEL >> >> > We don't have that: > # grep -r CLAMAV ./dspam > ./dspam/configure.ac:AC_DEFINE(CLAMAV, 1, [Defined if clamav is enabled]

Re: [Dspam-devel] ClamAV

2009-12-11 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:31 + Paul Cockings wrote: > Why do we have two options for clamav? > > CLAMAV > CLAMAV_DEVEL > We don't have that: # grep -r CLAMAV ./dspam ./dspam/configure.ac:AC_DEFINE(CLAMAV, 1, [Defined if clamav is enabled]) ./dspam/src/dspam.c:#ifdef CLAMAV ./dspam/src/

[Dspam-devel] ClamAV

2009-12-11 Thread Paul Cockings
Why do we have two options for clamav? CLAMAV CLAMAV_DEVEL -- Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _