Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:20:16 +0200
> Von: Julien Valroff
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM preferences
> Le mercredi 22 juillet 2009 à 16:31 +0200, Steve a écrit :
> > > I think this is
Le mercredi 22 juillet 2009 à 16:31 +0200, Steve a écrit :
> > I think this is quite complicated, don't you think?
> >
> To be honest? No. I don't think it is complicated. I have memorized it
> by thinking: What would be the logical approach to set preferences?
>
> And that helped me. To me it is
> I think this is quite complicated, don't you think?
>
To be honest? No. I don't think it is complicated. I have memorized it by
thinking: What would be the logical approach to set preferences?
And that helped me. To me it is logical to use the preference extension on
storage engines where this
Julien Valroff wrote:
> I think this is quite complicated, don't you think?
> I guess one way to fix default preferences should be enough, as at the end,
> after some time, you might forget how things work if you want to change
> something (it happened to me with DSPAM some time ago, and thought th
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:25:54 +0200, "Steve" wrote:
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:43:23 +0200
>> Von: Julien Valroff
>> An: Steve
>> CC: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM prefer
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:43:23 +0200
> Von: Julien Valroff
> An: Steve
> CC: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM preferences
> Hello Steve,
>
> Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 21
Hello Steve,
Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 21:31 +0200, Steve a écrit :
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:34:39 +0200
> > Von: Julien Valroff
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM preferences
>
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:34:39 +0200
> Von: Julien Valroff
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM preferences
> Hi,
>
> Following to Stevan's suggestion in the discussion around sf bug
> #28
Hi,
Following to Stevan's suggestion in the discussion around sf bug
#2824760:
I would say that the logic regarding preferences should be:
Priority 1) User preferences
Priority 2) Use group preferences
Priority 3) Use default preferences (uid 0)
Fallback) Use preferences from dspam.conf
I take th
