On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:04:52 +0100
José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hello,
> my apologies for jumping into the thread so late.
>
> Paul Cockings wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> No. Barracuda normally sends quarantine messages to end users and they can
> >> then say if a mail is ham/spam by pre
Hi all,
my apologies for jumping into the thread so late.
Paul Cockings wrote:
> [snip]
>> No. Barracuda normally sends quarantine messages to end users and they can
>> then say if a mail is ham/spam by pressing a link inside the mail. The link
>> has the username/password already encoded i
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:11:16 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 20/01/2010 11:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >
> >> I do like Steeve's idea about the quarantine report with html
> >> links
> >> - this could be a good option - What do you think about this idea?
> >>
> > I think it's a good id
On 20/01/2010 11:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
>> I do like Steeve's idea about the quarantine report with html
>> links
>> - this could be a good option - What do you think about this idea?
>>
> I think it's a good idea since I suggested it back in August :)
>
I've taken a look back t
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:11:04 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 19/01/2010 21:49, Edgar Díaz Orellana wrote:
> > /spam button solution. But they don't do it. Guess why?
> >
> > Currently kaspersky antivir had this pluggin to your outlook, runs
> > on every version
> > of outlook from 2000 to 201
On 19/01/2010 21:49, Edgar Díaz Orellana wrote:
> /spam button solution. But they don't do it. Guess why?
>
> Currently kaspersky antivir had this pluggin to your outlook, runs on every
> version
> of outlook from 2000 to 2010 beta without problem, i'm tested by request on
> the company i'm wor
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:12:25 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 23:07, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> Do you know how/when the quarantine messages are triggered?
> - per message?, per x number of message in quarantine?, time based?
>
>
>
>
On 18/01/2010 23:07, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
Do you know how/when the quarantine messages are triggered?
- per message?, per x number of message in quarantine?, time based?
>>> I think it's time based. For DSPAM I think a time and/or message count
>
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:58:43 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 22:25, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Arhhh, this sound interesting too. This sounds like something that
> >> could be added to dspam without much core change- right?
> >>
> >>
> > Right.
> >
> >
> >
On 18/01/2010 22:25, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>> Arhhh, this sound interesting too. This sounds like something that
>> could be added to dspam without much core change- right?
>>
>>
> Right.
>
>
>
>> Do you know how/when the quarantine messages are triggered?
>> - per messa
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:16:49 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 22:09, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:01:18 +
> > Paul Cockings wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 18/01/2010 21:54, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Look for example at Barracuda. Have they a plugin for
On 18/01/2010 22:09, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:01:18 +
> Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>
>> On 18/01/2010 21:54, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Look for example at Barracuda. Have they a plugin for Outlook? No!
>>> They send HTML links in HTML mails. They avoid the additio
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:01:18 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 21:54, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
> > Look for example at Barracuda. Have they a plugin for Outlook? No!
> > They send HTML links in HTML mails. They avoid the additional hassle
> > to deal with a plugin. They go the simpler pa
On 18/01/2010 21:54, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> Look for example at Barracuda. Have they a plugin for Outlook? No!
> They send HTML links in HTML mails. They avoid the additional hassle
> to deal with a plugin. They go the simpler path.
Can you describe a bit further how this works? Are the retaini
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:34:38 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 21:26, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +
> > Paul Cockings wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >>
> So the options could be...
>
> - send to dspam
On 18/01/2010 21:48, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 09:34 PM, Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>> On 18/01/2010 21:26, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +
>>> Paul Cockingswrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
On 01/18/2010 09:34 PM, Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 21:26, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +
>> Paul Cockings wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>>>
>>>
> So the options could be...
>
> - send to dspam serv
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:29:58 -0300
Edgar Díaz Orellana wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:26:00 +0100, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +
> > Paul Cockings wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> So the options could be...
>
On 18/01/2010 21:26, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +
> Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>
>> On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>>
So the options could be...
- send to dspam server on the lan
- send to dspam server on the wan
- send to dspam
Hi.
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:26:00 +0100, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +
> Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>> On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So the options could be...
>> >>
>> >> - send to dspam server on the lan
>> >> - send to dspam server on the wan
>>
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >>
> >> So the options could be...
> >>
> >> - send to dspam server on the lan
> >> - send to dspam server on the wan
> >> - send to dspam relay service
> >>
> >> I suppose all of these could be s
On 18/01/2010 21:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>>
>> So the options could be...
>>
>> - send to dspam server on the lan
>> - send to dspam server on the wan
>> - send to dspam relay service
>>
>> I suppose all of these could be setup and a clever bit of coding
>> discovers what is available to the user (
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:58:44 +
Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/01/2010 20:51, Steve wrote:
> >
> >> or should the design be changed if we
> >> wanted to develop this idea?
> >>
> >>
> > Depends. A web service works differently. The above mechanism is pure HTTP
> > while a web service work
On 18/01/2010 20:51, Steve wrote:
>
>> or should the design be changed if we
>> wanted to develop this idea?
>>
>>
> Depends. A web service works differently. The above mechanism is pure HTTP
> while a web service works asynchronously.
>
>
so a 'proper' webservice would give an acknowled
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:30:50 +
> Von: Paul Cockings
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: [Dspam-devel] Webservice training
> So it seems like we can already use this style of request to train
> email.
So it seems like we can already use this style of request to train
email. (i'm thinking that forwarding via SMTP is not always best)
*Train to Spam*
http://www.domain.tld/dspam/[email protected]&retrain=spam&signatureID=11,4b54909b399539992375514
26 matches
Mail list logo
