On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:10:56 +0100 (CET)
"Nicolas Grekas" wrote:
> > Here I have to intercept. That 0.35 to 0.65 is not that easy to compute
>
> Ok, I read libdspam.c:_ds_calc_stat, not that easy :)
> So we have to remove the related query and sql variable
>
Did that already and added this to t
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:50:12 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:28:01PM +0100, Stevan Baji?? wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:30:28 +0100 (CET)
> > "Nicolas Grekas" wrote:
> >
> > > > I would do that differently. I would query the default (uid 0)
> > >
> > > You are ri
> Here I have to intercept. That 0.35 to 0.65 is not that easy to compute
Ok, I read libdspam.c:_ds_calc_stat, not that easy :)
So we have to remove the related query and sql variable
> Looking good IMHO. Need to quickly test it and then push it to GIT :)
cool :)
for postgre, sorry, I'm not your
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:28:01PM +0100, Stevan Baji?? wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:30:28 +0100 (CET)
> "Nicolas Grekas" wrote:
>
> > > I would do that differently. I would query the default (uid 0)
> >
> > You are right ! I've learnd that uid 0 is the default very recently
> > and forgot to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:30:28 +0100 (CET)
"Nicolas Grekas" wrote:
> --
> -- Delete unused tokens, except for TOE, TUM and NOTRAIN modes
> --
> START TRANSACTION;
> DELETE LOW_PRIORITY QUICK
> FROM t USING dspam_token_data t
> LEFT JOIN dspam_preferences p ON p.preference = 'trainingMode' AND
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:30:28 +0100 (CET)
"Nicolas Grekas" wrote:
> > I would do that differently. I would query the default (uid 0)
>
> You are right ! I've learnd that uid 0 is the default very recently
> and forgot to take it into account
>
:)
> > According to dspam.conf:[...]
>
> so, I've
> I would do that differently. I would query the default (uid 0)
You are right ! I've learnd that uid 0 is the default very recently
and forgot to take it into account
> According to dspam.conf:[...]
so, I've taken your updated script, and crafted it to follow as close as
possible what dspam_cle
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:57:45 +0100 (CET)
"Nicolas Grekas" wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hallo Nicolas,
> first of all, thank you for having permitted dspam to survive after some month
> of inactivity !
>
:)
> I've just checked the latest source for purge-4.1.sql script,
> and I think I have a better on
