On Friday 24 April 2009 7:23:19 am RW wrote:
> If you are using dspam as a filter, I can't see how you could get away
> with not having --stdout. I don't recognise --deliver-spam, but if you
> meant --deliver=spam then I think that would mean discard ham.
I did have --stdout originally, but though
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:48:01 +1000
Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> I am new to dspam. Mine is a simple workstation, not a server. I
> have tried white-listing, but find that it causes more problems than
> it solves. I have been running SpamAssassin, but it seems powerless
> to filter any of the current
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Paul Cockings wrote:
> Lars Stavholm wrote:
> > Paul Cockings wrote:
> >
> >> Hello List,
> >>
> >> Without wanting to cause a riot, Does anyone have any favourite
> >> DNS-BL's they use?
> >>
> >> I tried UCEProtect for a while, but too many false pos
Lars Stavholm wrote:
> Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>> Hello List,
>>
>> Without wanting to cause a riot, Does anyone have any favourite
>> DNS-BL's they use?
>>
>> I tried UCEProtect for a while, but too many false positives.
>> Currently running Spamhaus + Postgrey and Dspam, but looking to reje
