On 06/07/10 23:49, Paul Cockings wrote:
>
>> If we are going to remove the file based backends... then what next? Are we
>> going to remove all the tokenizers and then just leave one? And then? Are we
>> going to remove all the algorithms and just leave one?
>>
>> I really think that DSPAM is a
Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
> My personal feeling is that people got so much obsessed with this "everything
> in a database" that they missuse this as an excuse to not start
> coding/building a new web ui.
>
My initial request for all items in DB was the hope it would be easier
to setup multiple ma
Stevan Bajić wrote:
> Hallo list,
>
> just have seen that here:
> http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1707960&cid=32793724
>
> Who was that? Must be some one from this mailing list.
>
>
>
Donno, but even if it attracts 1 new developer i'd be very happy.
-
Stevan Bajić wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:52:49 +0200
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 05/07/10 09:51, Stevan Bajić wrote:
After all the Web-UI has been the part most DSPAM users have said to
work on if the project would become open source.
True.
The last time I checked into discussions on this is
