On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:12:22 +0200
Norman Uittenbogaart wrote:
> Hello I have the following problem.
> I have two shared,managed groups, but for only one group this is indeed
> working.
> For the other group it still has a separate quarantine etc ...
> The group beginning with norman@ works.
>
Hmm actually did not completely fix it ...
It now has the domain as the shared,managed group ... but now does not
use the classification group at all :(
Apparently shared can't fall back on a other group :(
21747: [07/16/2010 18:01:13] assigning user ded183@.nl to
shared group sander@.nl
21747: [
Hi Paul :)
Good tip the debug hehe
The problem was that the classification group was higher in the group
file then the shared user.
It used that group first so skipped the rest as the classification was
also a global group.
I think this fixed it
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Norman Uitte
Hello Paul,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:47 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:12:22 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart
> wrote:
>> Hello I have the following problem.
>> I have two shared,managed groups, but for only one group this is indeed
>> working.
>> For the other group it still has a separate qu
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:12:22 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart
wrote:
> Hello I have the following problem.
> I have two shared,managed groups, but for only one group this is indeed
> working.
> For the other group it still has a separate quarantine etc ...
> The group beginning with norman@ works.
>
>
Hello I have the following problem.
I have two shared,managed groups, but for only one group this is indeed working.
For the other group it still has a separate quarantine etc ...
The group beginning with norman@ works.
What am I doing wrong here ?
Group files looks like the below and I restarted
> What MTA are you using? Maybe I could help to harden your setup? I have so
> far helped two users from the DSPAM mailing list to harden their setup and I
> would say that those little things have helped to cut their Spam rate by
> factors.
>
> @Marko Weber and Paul Cockings: If you are readin
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:32:53 +0200
Cyril' wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hello,
> Let's assume I have an organization where I want an antispam installed,
> but the users are too dumb/busy/unhelpish to process their own receied
> spam and forward it to the retrain process, in any way. (Not an academic
> pr
Hi all,
Let's assume I have an organization where I want an antispam installed,
but the users are too dumb/busy/unhelpish to process their own receied
spam and forward it to the retrain process, in any way. (Not an academic
problem, it's the story of my life). I don't even talk about using a web
g
